|
Recurrence Analysis
The second method of nonlinear analysis examined in the feasibility study was
recurrence analysis (RA). Eckmann, Kamphorst and Ruelle (1987) first introduced the
recurrence plot as a graphical tool to locate hidden rhythms, patterns and
nonstationarities in experimental data. Recurrence analysis is the quantification of
features of recurrence plots. Such features include correlation among the data points in
multidimensional embedding space, percent determinism in the correlations, entropy, and an
estimate of the Lyapunov exponent that measures the sensitive dependence to initial
conditions. More information on RA as well as excellent freeware can be found at http://home.netcome.com/~ eugenek/download.html
When applied to physiological data RA is shown to detect shifts in physiological
states, such as onset of fatigue and anesthesia-induced respiratory changes, earlier than
competing methods (Webber & Zbilut, 1994). The successful use of RA in a social
science context may provide information on shifts in dynamics in the process (teen births)
that precede changes in the mean or variance of the series. Such an early indicator of
state shift in the system might allow for more sensitive evaluation of the effects of
policy and intervention and might also be useful for targeting the timing of interventions
to decrease births to teens.
In the color version of RA shown in Figure 5 a point in the plot is color-coded.
Vectors in the series correlated within the same tolerance are represented in the matrix
with the same color. The x and y axes represent starting points of vectors formed from the
series. On the diagonal, points in the series are perfectly correlated with themselves.
Points off-diagonal indicate the presence or absence of correlation of each vector with
other vectors in the series. Points that are white or red are highly correlated; those
that are blue or black are less strongly correlated. Just as with a linear correlation
matrix, the information contained in the graph is a mirror image above and below the
diagonal.

Figure 5. Recurrence plot for births to teens from 1964 1998 (On the color
bar to the right of the graph 0.00 means no distance between vectors [perfect correlation]
and 123.00 refers to maximum distance between vectors [weakest correlation].)
The plot shows changes in correlation in the time series, some roughly coinciding with
changes in policy influencing reproductive behavior of teens. Notably, the period from
1964 to 1970 (points 1 to 2556 on the x and y axes) seems to be one of strong correlation
in the series (more white points in the matrix). In 1970 (point 2556) Title X legislation
made contraceptives available at all federally funded clinics. In a reversal of policy,
The Adolescent Family Life Act or Chastity Bill was passed in 1981 (point 6574). There is
insufficient evidence to claim causal relationships between the policies noted and the RA
results but these findings do warrant further investigation. The findings are consistent
with the evidence of a renormalization group process mentioned earlier. Across the time
period social systems and agents appear to have been adapting to changes within their
environment. Atwood and Kasindorf (1992) describe the complexity of adolescent behavior
this way, "
multiple inconsistent inputs lead to inconsistent responses by many
adolescents" (p. 355). It remains to be seen whether linear analysis of teens
responses to inconsistent policies across time can capture the complex patterns that
emerged in RA. Currently, investigation is underway to further explore specific quantities
derived from RA and to determine their sensitivity to policy changes.
Another use of RA is the comparison of data sets collected over identical time periods.
The data could be from geographic regions such as the public health regions mentioned
above or from demographic groups such as Hispanic and Black and White teens. Differences
in correlation among the data points, percent determinism in the correlations, entropy,
and Lyapunov exponent could then be determined and linked to sociodemographic factors
accounting for those differences.
|